Mortgage Report 2026 | A Look At Where Australia is headed

FY25 certainly wasn’t boring. We saw more loans written, larger dollar volumes flowing through the system, and a housing market that behaved very differently from state to state. Momentum returned in some regions with record median values, while others moved more cautiously as affordability, migration patterns and policy settings shaped local conditions.

Interest rate expectations shifted, investor appetite strengthened, and first-home buyer activity remained a key driver in select markets. At the same time, refinancing volumes continued to reflect borrowers actively reassessing their positions in a higher-for-longer rate environment.

What became increasingly clear over the year is that there is no single “Australian mortgage market” — there are multiple micro-markets operating simultaneously. Western Australia and Queensland displayed very different dynamics to Victoria and the ACT. Loan sizes, approval times, serviceability buffers and buyer sentiment all told slightly different stories depending on postcode.

In this report, we break down what actually happened — where growth accelerated, where it cooled, and what that means heading into 2026. I’ll include simple interactive charts where they add clarity, so you can see the trends rather than just read about them.

Whether you’re a borrower, broker, investor or industry professional, this report is designed to cut through the noise and provide a clear, data-driven view of where the mortgage market stands — and where it may be heading next.

Firstly, let’s begin by taking a look at the Australia Property Market Performance Graph….

Australian Property Market Performance

City November % Change Annual % Change % Change from Peak Median Value
Sydney 0.5% 5.1% New high $1,269,659
Melbourne 0.3% 4.2% -0.9% $823,495
Brisbane 1.9% 12.8% New high $1,015,767
Adelaide 1.9% 8.2% New high $891,004
Perth 2.4% 13.1% New high $914,229
Hobart 1.2% 4.7% -6.9% $703,340
Darwin 1.9% 17.0% New high $578,871
Canberra 1.0% 4.2% -2.4% $891,626
Capital Avg 1.0% 7.1% New high $978,077
Regional Avg 1.1% 8.6% New high $723,107
National Avg 1.0% 7.5% New high $888,941

The graph highlights a broad-based lift in property values across most Australian capital cities, with national dwelling values up 1.0% for the month and 7.5% annually — pushing the national median to $888,941 and marking a new high.

Perth, Brisbane and Darwin were standout performers, recording the strongest annual growth rates (13.1%, 12.8% and 17.0% respectively), all sitting at fresh peak values. This reinforces the continued strength of the smaller capital markets, particularly those benefiting from interstate migration, relative affordability and tight housing supply.

Sydney also reached a new high, with steady annual growth of 5.1%, pushing its median value above $1.26 million. While not the fastest-growing market, it remains the most expensive.

Melbourne, Hobart and Canberra tell a slightly different story. Although values have risen over the past year, they remain below previous peaks, indicating a more gradual recovery phase compared to the sharper momentum seen in WA and Queensland.

Regionally, the picture remains strong. Regional markets recorded annual growth of 8.6%, also reaching new highs, reflecting continued demand beyond the major metro centres.

🏡 Property Owners

Got an empty house sitting there?

If your property is vacant and your mortgage is still ticking over, we can help turn it into income. National Accommodation Services Australia (NASA) manages short-term stays end-to-end — so you can earn without the hassle.

  • We place your property into the NASA short-stay network
  • Full management — bookings, cleaning, guest screening & pricing
  • Owner portal access with live calendar & performance tracking
Turn vacancy into income
Get a quick, no-obligation income estimate and see what your property could earn.
Or email us directly at info@nationalaccommodation.com.au

Overall, the key takeaway is that the national market is expanding — but growth is not uniform. Performance is being driven disproportionately by Western Australia and Queensland, while parts of the east coast are recovering more moderately.

Snapshot (quick bullets):

  • New loans (FY25): 544,630 — roughly +6.8% y/y.

  • Residential portion: 96% of new loans (521,750).

  • Aggregate new‑loan value (FY25): $380.6 billion — much stronger dollar growth than count growth.

  • Refinances (FY25): 401,114 — up a little (+1.1%).

  • VIC recorded 148,126 new mortgages (largest by mortgage count); other states combine for the remaining ~396,504.

Volumes rose, but dollars rose faster If you hear “more loans” you might assume everything is normal — but when the total dollars moved rise faster than the number of loans it usually means larger average loans (higher prices) or a shift toward higher‑value transactions. That changes who’s competing for homes: not just more buyers, but richer ones in many suburbs.

FY25: New loans — Volume vs Aggregate Value FY25: New loans — Volume vs Aggregate Value Volume (count) 0 300k 600k New loans: 544,630 544,630 Aggregate value ($bn) 0 200 400 Aggregate value: $380.6 bn $380.6 bn

Almost everything is residential

About 96% of new loans were for residential properties. That concentration matters: household servicing risk dominates the credit picture. For buyers, that raises the stakes of rate moves; for policymakers, it concentrates vulnerability in household balance sheets.

Residential share of new loans in FY25 Residential share (FY25) 96% Residential Residential — 96% (≈521,750) Other — 4% (≈22,880)

States diverge: VIC vs the rest

Victoria recorded 148,126 new mortgages; the rest of the nation accounts for the remaining ~396,504. That split matters: mortgage behaviour, first‑home buyer activity and investor demand vary by state — and national headlines hide those differences.

New mortgages by state (VIC vs others aggregated) New mortgages (FY25) — VIC vs other states VIC — 148,126 new mortgages VIC 148,126 Other states (aggregated) — 396,504 new mortgages Other (aggregated) 396,504 Note: "Other" is aggregated. Use state-level data for more detail.

Refinancing: small rise, strategic importance

Refinances increased only slightly: ~401,114 (≈ +1.1%). That small rise suggests most borrowers who could or wanted to refinance already did, and many now wait until clear savings appear. Practically: refinancing still pays when the math is clean; it’s not automatic.

The 2026 outlook: rise with nuance

Pulling forecasts together (KPMG, AMP, Domain, Money/industry reads): the consensus isn’t a crash — more like “regional gains, some slowdown, interest‑rate uncertainty.” KPMG flagged continued price rises into 2026 in many markets; AMP and some other analysts caution an easing in momentum. The bottom line: expect local variation. National averages will smooth away the bits you care about most — suburb and segment.

Price trend index (illustrative FY20–2026) FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 2026 (proj) Price index (illustrative) — Higher = stronger

What this means for different players

  • First‑home buyers: competition and higher average loan sizes make it harder; look for suburbs with lower mortgage competition, secure pre‑approval and model worst‑case rates.

  • Investors: pick suburbs where rents are growing — price growth alone won’t save a weak yield.

  • Refinancers: calculate break‑even; small rate moves don’t always pay for fees.

  • Lenders & policymakers: residential concentration means household servicing risk is the dominant macro lever.

Quick NASA tactical checklist

  • Run a realistic 5‑year budget scenario.

  • If buying: pre‑approval + local suburb research beats national headlines.

  • If refinancing: test break‑even and keep an emergency buffer.

  • Track local supply metrics — new builds change dynamics faster than national price indices.

Your summary

FY25 showed stronger dollar momentum than count momentum — think bigger loans and higher prices in core segments, with the vast majority of credit still household‑oriented. 2026 likely sees modest gains in parts of the market and pauses elsewhere. The smart play is local research, realistic budgeting and avoiding the trap of believing national averages map to your suburb. It doesn’t.